Site icon

Cisco’s IoT System: Proving it’s Easy to Spell “IoT” Without “SP”

Peter Jarich

Summary Bullets:

Cisco has taken time in the past to outline the foundational components of IoT solutions. It’s “Internet of Things System” launch from late June, however, took this one step further in outlining solution building blocks, along with its own efforts to deliver new products supporting these solutions. What it didn’t do was to link these solutions to SP networks or agendas.

Cisco’s IoT System focuses on six “pillars” or IoT technology components: Network Connectivity, Fog Computing, Security, Data Analytics, Management and Automation, Application Enablement. As the market still grapples with what it takes to execute on the promise of IoT, this type of messaging makes sense. If nothing else, it’s solid marketing logic for Cisco to continually highlight its commitment to the space, a commitment that includes R&D and a willingness to partner where needed.

Where Cisco, in the past, has also argued for the critical role of the SP in making IoT a reality, a lack of SP-specific components in the IoT System is worth noting. To be fair, it’s not Cisco’s job to connect everything it does to the SP market or SP opportunities. Yet in an effort to drive IoT forward, ignoring SPs in the new solution launch is either a major mistake or an acknowledgment that the SP simply isn’t needed to make IoT work. Whether or not Cisco is explicitly ignoring the role of the SP in IoT is up for debate. Yet there are several links that could have easily been made to make the connection clearer.

It may not be incumbent on Cisco to explicitly call out opportunities for SPs or the links between new products and SP strategies. If the vendor truly believes that there is a role for the SP in moving IoT forward, however, it needs to be more explicit in messaging how its solutions fit SP needs.

Exit mobile version